Danielr19
Main Deck (60 cards)
x2
$0.20
x2
$0.39
$0.32
$1.75
x4
$0.14
x3
$0.70
$0.22
x3
$0.29
$0.21
$0.26
x2
$0.21
x2
$0.13
x2
$0.22
$0.26
$1.20
x2
$0.31
x2
$0.19
x4
$0.25
$0.20
$0.22
$0.20
x2
$0.23
x4
$0.31
x3
$0.40
x2
$0.17
x2
$0.28
$0.23
x8
$0.20
Pokémon
(14)
Trainer
(38)
Trainer
(38)
Card Types
Energy Types
Energy Curve
Distribution of attack energy costs in your deck
1 Energy
8 attacks
8
47.1% of attacks
2 Energy
7 attacks
7
41.2% of attacks
3 Energy
2 attacks
2
11.8% of attacks
Opening Hand Probability Calculator
Calculate the probability of drawing specific cards in your opening hand
%
Probability of drawing at least
of
in your opening hand
Other Expanded Decks
Comments
![]()
![]()
Test Hand
Opening Hand (7 cards)
Click "Redraw" to test a hand
Prize Cards (6 cards)
Click "Redraw" to test a hand
Shuffled using Fisher-Yates algorithm
This deck and any deck running no Stage 1 but Stage 2 and Basics only are not friends I can assure you that.
Played Tsareena EX control with Pidgeot EX and got stomped when usually Tsareena does the stomping, big oof made me start using at least one stage 1 on each deck that uses rare candies.
Jamming tower?
Evn hi, I don't know if you are asking if Jamming Tower (Twilight Masquerade) affects the deck negatively or if the deck could benefit from using it, so I'll answer both.
1.-Does Jamming tower affect the deck negatively?
It does, but not in a critical way. Jamming Tower may slow down the deck if it is placed turn one, but this is very unlikely. The deck benefits from going second and as far as I'm aware of there's no way to search for stadium cards at the moment, and if your opponent goes first they cant use supports to get new cards. Even if Jamming tower is placed at a critical moment, the deck has 2 lost vacuums and this item can be searched with arven if needed.
2.-Does the deck benefit from using Jamming Tower?
I think it depends on the current meta. Anything that can be used to slow down your opponent or prevent them from play their deck the way it is meant to be played, benefits this deck. Also, by blocking your opponent by using items you can prevent them from removing jamming tower from the field with a lost vacuum, limiting them to only removing the stadium with another stadium. Cancelling cologne or eri are cards that I think could be replaced for a Jamming Tower if needed, but again it would all depend on the current meta.
I feel jamming tower affects this deck positively. Most decks have strong tools (maximum belt, heros cape) and I think this can shut them off plus you can control when jamming tower is in play by using lost vac if u want to use a tool your self. And unless they have another stadium thy can't use tools or items!
Also since your deck shuts off items eri is not needed. Tho canceling cologne might be a good idea
Evn yeah, it can definitely benefit from jamming tower. I would at least keep one eri because there are times where you are forced to use banette's second attack in order to knock out an oponents pokemon. It machups like charizard just having one charizard evolve can make the matchup veru hard for banette. I sometimes would make my opponent increase their hand and then use eri before using the second attack only to discard rare candy or even superior energy retrieval which are super important cards for some decks and can sometimes guarantee you a win if your opponent can't use them at all.
You must be logged in to comment.